From Just in Time to Just in Case

Since the invention of just-in-time manufacturing in the 1960s, companies have been pursuing ever greater efficiency in their supply chains. Consolidating suppliers is one of the most common ways to reduce supply chain costs and improve efficiency. However, the risks of doing so are often overlooked. Robustness and resilience can be sacrificed along the way in exchange of greater efficiency.

Trade tensions

This approach works just fine until it doesn’t. The looming problem first became apparent as the trade relationship between the US and China started to deteriorate in late 2018. China is known as the world’s factory. It accounts for 35% of global manufacturing output.¹ Many multinational companies rely on its well-developed network of suppliers to produce their products. The trade dispute between the US and China prompted many companies to reassess their sources of inputs. However, that is easier said than done. After all, China has become a dominant manufacturing force for a reason. It has built a very efficient supply chain ecosystem over the years. Its labour and talent pool is still very attractive to many companies.

As global trade relationships continued to deteriorate further, countries and companies began to realise how critical it was to develop more diversified supplier networks. Some were even thinking about uprooting their manufacturing facilities and moving to other countries. Japan has already announced that it will provide funding to help companies move manufacturing out of China. Toshiba and Komatsu have moved part of their component provision from China to Thailand, Mexico and Japan.² The US government is also considering providing incentives for US companies to pull component sources out of China.

And then COVID-19

As companies were scrambling to restructure their supply networks to minimise the impact of trade tariffs, the COVID-19 pandemic hit the world. This time, the pandemic fully exposed the vulnerability of global logistics networks. 94% of Fortune 1000 companies saw supply chain disruption from COVID-19.³ Even global companies like Apple, Airbus and Hyundai encountered meaningful disruption in their supply chains. It once again highlighted the risk of overly-lean global supply systems.

‘Near-shoring’ supply chains

Businesses are rethinking their supply networks and looking to build flexibility and resilience to protect against future disruptions. In the second quarter of 2020, the topic of ‘supply chains’ was discussed on nearly 80% of all investment analyst calls within the industrial, consumer and tech hardware sectors⁴. The specific theme of ‘near shoring’ – identifying supply chains that are domestic or regional – was mentioned on over 15% of these calls. More than three times the previous peak in 2013.

One of our investee companies, Premier Inc, is a case in point. Premier is a group purchasing organization in the US, which plays a unique role as a connection point between healthcare providers and suppliers. It has been helping its customers to diversify their sources of supplies for many years. However, personal protection equipment (PPE) products are still overwhelmingly sourced from outside the US with approximately 80% coming from China and Southeast Asia⁵. In response to COVID-19, Premier has started working with domestic PPE manufacturers to expand their production lines.

The issue has also attracted the attention of policy-makers. US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has expressed an ambition to rebuild the US supply network for critical medical supplies. The plan will provide incentives to create more resilient supply-chains by shifting production of a range of critical products back to the US. COVID-19 will, in our view, accelerate supply chain automation. Technologies such as the Internet of Things, robotics and artificial intelligence play a key role here. These technologies bring many benefits in manufacturing and warehouse automation. They provide higher productivity, improved safety, more efficient use of materials and more predictable quality.

Such automation technologies are particularly useful in the manufacturing and retail sectors given the spike of e-commerce in recent months. WHEB’s strategy holds a Japanese company called Keyence which provides sensors and machine vision systems for factory automation. We also hold two leading warehouse automation companies Daifuku and Kion. Their products improve logistics efficiency in factories and warehouses. They also help reduce energy consumption and improve employee safety.

This global pandemic calls for re-prioritising between supply chain resilience and efficiency. We do not believe these are necessarily mutually exclusive objectives. Technologies are now ready to offer solutions to strike a better balance between the two.

¹ McKinsey Global Institute
² The Australian Financial Review
³ Fortune
⁴ Morgan Stanley
⁵ Premier Inc.

Important Notices:
Risks include: the price of shares (“Shares”) in FP WHEB Sustainability Fund (“Fund”) may increase or decrease and you may not get back the amount originally invested, for reasons including adverse market and foreign exchange rate movements. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. The Fund invests in equities and is exposed to price fluctuations in the equity markets, and focuses on investments in mid-sized companies in certain sectors so its performance may not correlate closely with the MSCI World Index (the Fund’s benchmark). For full risks, please see fund prospectus on www.whebgroup.com.
General: This blog, its contents and any related communication (altogether, the “Blog”) is issued by WHEB Asset Management LLP (“WHEB Asset Management”). It is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to buy or sell any security including any shares in the FP WHEB Sustainability Fund, including in the United States. It should not be relied upon to make an investment decision in relation to Shares in the FP WHEB Sustainability Fund or otherwise; any such investment decision should be made only on the basis of the Fund scheme documents and appropriate professional advice. This Blog does not constitute advice of any kind, investment research or a research recommendation, is in summary form and is subject to change without notice. The performance shown does not take account of any commissions and costs charged when subscribing to and redeeming shares. WHEB Asset Management has exercised reasonable care in preparing this Blog including using reliable sources, however, makes no representation or warranty relating to its accuracy, reliability or completeness or whether any future event may or may not occur. This Blog is only made available to recipients who may lawfully receive it in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and rules and binding guidance of regulators. WHEB Asset Management LLP is registered in England and Wales with number OC 341489 and has its registered office at 7 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PE. WHEB Asset Management LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with Firm Reference Number 496413. FundRock Partners Limited (formerly Fund Partners Limited) is the Authorised Corporate Director of the Fund and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with Firm Reference Number 469278 and has its registered office at 8-9 Lovat Lane, London EC3R 8DW. The state of the origin of the Fund is England and Wales. The Representative in Switzerland is ACOLIN Fund Services AG, Affolternstrasse 56, CH-8050 Zurich, whilst the Paying Agent is Bank Vontobel Ltd, Gotthardstrasse 43, CH-8022 Zurich. The relevant documents such as the prospectus, the key investor information document (KIIDs), the Articles of Association as well as the annual and semi-annual reports may be obtained free of charge from the representative in Switzerland.
The MSCI information may only be used for your internal use, may not be reproduced or re-dissseminated in any form and may not be used as a basis for or a component of any financial instruments or products or indices. None of the MSCI information is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such. Historical data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. The MSCI information is provided on an “as is” basis and the user of this information assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, each of its affiliates and each other person involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating any MSCI information (collectively, the “MSCI Parties”) expressly disclaims all warranties (including, without limitation, any warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, non-infringement, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose) with respect to this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall any MSCI Party have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential (including, without limitation, lost profits) or any other damages (www.msci.com)